Doe v. Howard et al
Jane Doe |
Russell Howard and Linda Howard |
1:2011cv01105 |
October 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Out of Country |
Liam O'Grady |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
Other Civil Rights |
18 USC 1595 Human Trafficking Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 133 ORDER that the Court adopts and incorporates the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants are liable for involuntary servitude in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1584; forced labor in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1589; trafficking with respect to forced labor or involuntary servitude in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, which is the subject of 18 U.S.C. 1584, 1589, and 1590; Conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1594 and ci vil conspiracy in violation of common law; and unjust enrichmont. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Russell Howard is additionally liable for obstructing enforcement in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1590(b). (See ORDER for details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 9/4/12. (dper) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to strike 42 is GRANTED, and Mrs. Howards's request 37 is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr on 2/27/2012. (tche) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.