MSSI Acquisition, LLC v. Azmat Consulting, Inc. et al
| MSSI Acquisition, LLC |
| Azmat Consulting, Inc. and Tariq Azmat |
| 1:2011cv01312 |
| December 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Fairfax |
| Leonie M. Brinkema |
| Ivan D. Davis |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER. Accordingly, the Court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Report as its own and for the reasons contained in the Report, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. No. 13] be and is GRANTED IN PART an d DENIED IN PART, and it is further ORDERED that a default judgment as to Count 1 (breach of contract) in the amount of $100,000.00 with prejudgment interest at the Virginia statutory rate starting from December 30, 2008 and post-judgment intere st at the prevailing federal rate be and is entered in plaintiff's favor against defendants Azmat Consulting, Inc. and Tariq Azmat, jointly and severally, and it is further ORDERED that all other claims in the complaint be and are DISMISSED. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 8/13/12. (nhall)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 19 MOTION to Set Aside Default by Tariq Azmat, Azmat Consulting, Inc.. (See Memorandum Opinion For Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 7/12/12. (nhall)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
