Maaraba v. Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tarek Maaraba
Defendant: Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv01564
Filed: December 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Fairfax
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Presiding Judge: Claude M. Hilton
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION in re 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 03/25/2014. (jlan)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maaraba v. Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Poretz
Represented By: Stephen Andrew Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tarek Maaraba
Represented By: Nicholas H. Hantzes
Represented By: Jessica Potter Bunce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?