Matammu v. County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department
Plaintiff: Lolita R Matammu
Defendant: County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department
Case Number: 1:2020cv01468
Filed: November 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Rossie D Alston
Referring Judge: Michael S Nachmanoff
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Memorandum in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lolita R Matammu. (Lopez-Knapp, Claudia)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 2/12/2021 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 601 before District Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. (clar, )
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Hearing Date set for February 12, 2021 re #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Greenzweig, Jamie)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Charge of Discrimination)(Greenzweig, Jamie)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department. (Greenzweig, Jamie)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lolita R Matammu County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department served on 12/23/2020, answer due 1/13/2021 (Lopez-Knapp, Claudia)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Claudia Mabel Lopez-Knapp on behalf of Lolita R Matammu (Lopez-Knapp, Claudia)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(shea)
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Lolita R Matammu. (McClanahan, Dirk)
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (shea)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7519360.), filed by Lolita R Matammu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McClanahan, Dirk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matammu v. County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lolita R Matammu
Represented By: Dirk Harris McClanahan
Represented By: Claudia Mabel Lopez-Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Fairfax, Virginia aka Fairfax County Health Department
Represented By: Jamie Marie Greenzweig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?