Ward v. Clarke
Petitioner: Norel Sterling Ward and Norell Sterling Ward
Respondent: Director Harold Clarke
Case Number: 1:2022cv00381
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Leonie M Brinkema
Referring Judge: Ivan D Davis
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Letter to court from Norel Sterling Ward. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(show)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Exhibits by Norel Sterling Ward. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(kgall)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Norel Sterling Ward. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(kgall)
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED that Civil Action Number 1:22cv181 be and is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to petitioner's ability to pursue the same claim in Civil Action Number 1:22cv381 (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 5/4/2022. (kgall) (C/S to plaintiff)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED that the petition be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order. ORDERED that petitioner either pay the filing fee, or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 4/13/2022. (kgall) (C/S w/ IFP application to plaintiff)
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:22-cv-00098. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2022: #2 Prisoner Data Report) (ldab, ).
April 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Notification of transfer of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:22cv98 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, )
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order transferring case (and petitioner's simultaneously filed motion to proceed in forma pauperis) to the Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 4/4/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 4/6/2022.]
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Norel Sterling Ward. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(tvt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 4/6/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ward v. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Norel Sterling Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Norell Sterling Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director Harold Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?