ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.
Defendant: Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Virginia, Inc. and Verizon South Inc.
Case Number: 2:2010cv00248
Filed: May 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 1209 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting plaintiff's 964 Motion for Permanent Injunction; directing Verizon to pay sunset royalties of $2.74 per FiOS TV subscriber per month on the first day of each month beginning December 1, 2011. The December payment may be paid by December 16, 2011. Pursuant to the Court's grant of a sunset provision, this Permanent Injunction Order will take effect on May 23, 2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 11/23/11. (mwin, )
November 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 1185 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 989 MOTION to Alter or Amend the Judgment Under Rule 59(e) Based on Newly Discovered Evidence. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/6/2011 and filed on 11/7/2011. (rsim)
October 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 1154 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that ActiveVideo is entitled to supplemental damages in the amount of $17,438,952, prejudgment interest in the amount of $6,687,511, and post-judgment interest for Verizon's infringement of its patents commencing on August 2, 2011, the date judgment was entered. Accordingly, ActiveVideo's motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/14/2011. (rsim)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 1149 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that ActiveVideo is entitled to supplemental damages in the amount of $17,422,575, prejudgment interest in the amount of $6,687,511, and post-judgment interest for Verizon's infringement of its patents commencing on August 2, 2011, the date judgment was entered. Accordingly, ActiveVideo's motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/13/2011. (rsim)
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 984 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,169,542 and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law that U.S. Patent No. 7,561,214 is Not Invalid are both GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/17/2011 nunc pro tunc 7/29/2011 and filed on 8/17/2011. (rsim)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.
Represented By: Nathan Wayne McCutcheon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Services Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Virginia, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon South Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?