ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. |
Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Virginia, Inc. and Verizon South Inc. |
2:2010cv00248 |
May 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Norfolk Office |
Out of State |
Raymond A. Jackson |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1209 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting plaintiff's 964 Motion for Permanent Injunction; directing Verizon to pay sunset royalties of $2.74 per FiOS TV subscriber per month on the first day of each month beginning December 1, 2011. The December payment may be paid by December 16, 2011. Pursuant to the Court's grant of a sunset provision, this Permanent Injunction Order will take effect on May 23, 2012. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 11/23/11. (mwin, ) |
Filing 1185 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 989 MOTION to Alter or Amend the Judgment Under Rule 59(e) Based on Newly Discovered Evidence. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/6/2011 and filed on 11/7/2011. (rsim) |
Filing 1154 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that ActiveVideo is entitled to supplemental damages in the amount of $17,438,952, prejudgment interest in the amount of $6,687,511, and post-judgment interest for Verizon's infringement of its patents commencing on August 2, 2011, the date judgment was entered. Accordingly, ActiveVideo's motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/14/2011. (rsim) |
Filing 1149 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that ActiveVideo is entitled to supplemental damages in the amount of $17,422,575, prejudgment interest in the amount of $6,687,511, and post-judgment interest for Verizon's infringement of its patents commencing on August 2, 2011, the date judgment was entered. Accordingly, ActiveVideo's motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/13/2011. (rsim) |
Filing 984 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,169,542 and Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law that U.S. Patent No. 7,561,214 is Not Invalid are both GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/17/2011 nunc pro tunc 7/29/2011 and filed on 8/17/2011. (rsim) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.