Clear Sky Car Wash LLC et al v. City of Chesapeake Virginia et al
| Samuel Jacknin, Charles Einsmann, Clear Sky Car Wash LLC and Clear Sky Car Wash Operating LLC |
| City of Chesapeake Virginia, Carole Gillespie, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Incorporated, Thomas Copeland, Evelyn Jones, Daniel Jones, Virginia Department of Transportation and United States Department of Transportation |
| 2:2012cv00194 |
| April 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Chesapeake City |
| Mark S. Davis |
| F. Bradford Stillman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration under rule 60(b) and alternative motion to amend under Rule 15. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 4/11/13. Copies distributed as directed.(afar)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 24 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 29 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 12/18/12. (jcow, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
