In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C., as Present Owner and Previous Owner Pro Hac Vice of the Barge Columbia Houston Offi v. NONE
||In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C.,
||December 13, 2012
||Virginia Eastern District Court
||Mark S. Davis
||Tommy E. Miller
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 10, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER - granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Mullens' motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(d) is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as the discovery disputes have since been resolved and, in any event, the evidence so ught would not have aided the Court in its decision. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, as the Mullens have failed to show that there is any genuine issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiffs violated any of the duties owed to them. Therefore, the Mullens' claims against Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Ceres' contribution claim against Limitation Plaintiffs is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as Plaintiffs are not liable to the Mullens for their negligence claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 1/10/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 1/10/14. (ldab, )
|February 20, 2014
ORDER Granting 79 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, the Mullens' motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a) (2) is GRANTED, as there is no unfair prejudice to Ceres. Therefore, the Mullens' crossclaims against Ceres are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Such dismissal brings this action to an end. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 2/20/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 2/20/14. (ldab, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.