Onego Shipping & Chartering, B.V. v. Kinder Morgan Elizabeth River Terminals, LLC et al

Plaintiff: Onego Shipping & Chartering, B.V.
Defendant: Kinder Morgan Elizabeth River Terminals, LLC and Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00120
Filed: March 4, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Chesapeake City
Presiding Judge: Mark S. Davis
Referring Judge: Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Onego Shipping & Chartering, B.V. v. Kinder Morgan Elizabeth River Terminals, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Onego Shipping & Chartering, B.V.
Represented By: Edward James Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kinder Morgan Elizabeth River Terminals, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.