Smaw v. Buffington et al

Plaintiff: Antonio Javon Smaw
Defendant: Raymond S. Buffington and New Prime, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00122
Filed: March 6, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Norfolk City
Referring Judge: Tommy E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smaw v. Buffington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Javon Smaw
Represented By: Stephen Mark Smith
Represented By: David Barnes Holt
Represented By: Craig Stewart Gill, Jr.
Represented By: Carlton F. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond S. Buffington
Represented By: Cullen Dennis Seltzer
Represented By: Terrence Lemarr Graves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Prime, Inc.
Represented By: Terrence Lemarr Graves
Represented By: Cullen Dennis Seltzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.