Al-Ami'n v. Clarke

Respondent: Harold Clarke
Petitioner: Rashi'd Qawi' Al-Ami'n
Case Number: 2:2013cv00167
Filed: April 2, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Culpeper
Referring Judge: Tommy E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 11, 2014 14 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL ORDER. It is ORDERED 6 Motion to Dismiss be granted, and 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Respondent. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Petitioner and counsel of record for Respondent. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 2/11/2014. Copies mailed 2/11/2014. (jmey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Al-Ami'n v. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Represented By: Richard Carson Vorhis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rashi'd Qawi' Al-Ami'n
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.