United States of America for the use and benefit of Lynnhaven Masonry Corporation v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Lynnhaven Masonry Corporation
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Case Number: 2:2013cv00172
Filed: April 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40 U.S.C. ยง 3131 Miller Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America for the use and benefit of Lynnhaven Masonry Corporation v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Lynnhaven Masonry Corporation
Represented By: John Bradley Reaves
Represented By: Rose Ellen Coley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?