Bobby et al v. School Board of the City of Norfolk
| L.G.B, Christopher Bobby and Ginny Bobby |
| School Board of the City of Norfolk |
| 2:2013cv00714 |
| December 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Norfolk City |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER: denying 40 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting Report and Recommendations re 46 Report and Recommendations. The court, having examined the Defendant's Objections to the R&R regarding Attorney's Fees, and having made de novo find ings with respect thereto, overrules the Defendant'sObjections, and does hereby adopt and approve in full the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on September 16, 2014. The court DENIES the Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B)(i). (Copies distributed as directed on 10/20/2014.) Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 10/20/2014. (bgra)
|
|
Filing
38
FINAL ORDER: Adopting Report and Recommendations re 34 Report and Recommendations.; Denying 27 Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. (See order for specifics). Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 7/7/14. (bgra)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
