Norfolk Coating Services, LLC v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
Norfolk Coating Services, LLC |
The Sherwin-Williams Company |
Norfolk Coating Services, LLC |
The Sherwin-Williams Company |
2:2014cv00188 |
May 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Norfolk Office |
Chesapeake City |
Lawrence R. Leonard |
Henry C. Morgan |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER that the Court GRANTS 26 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count Four of the Amended Complaint, WITH PREJUDICE, and DENIES AS MOOT 3 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Counts Four and Five of the Original Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller and filed on 11/12/2014. (rsim, ) |
Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER granting 24 Motion to Consolidate Cases. For the foregoing reasons, Norfolk Coating and Mr. Winterlings Motions to Consolidate Action Number 2:14cv212 with Action Number 2:14cv188 are GRANTED. Action No. 2:14cv188 - ECF No. 24; Action No. 2:14cv212 - ECF No. 15. There has been no consent to trial by a United States Magistrate Judge filed in Action No. 2:14cv188. Accordingly, this Opinion and Order is entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), an d any party may serve upon the other party and file with the Clerk written objections to the Opinion and Order within fourteen (14) days.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller and filed on 9/2/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 9/2/14. (ldab, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.