BASF Plant Science, LP v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation et al
BASF Plant Science, LP |
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Grains Research and Development Corporation and Nuseed Pty Ltd |
2:2017cv00503 |
September 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Norfolk Office |
Fairfax |
Lawrence R. Leonard |
Henry C. Morgan |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 281 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 892 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court FINDS that the verdict of the jury is not against the clear weight of the evidence. Accordingly, the Court DENIES both Proponents' and Opponents' motions for a new trial.The Court DENIES the Proponents& #039; Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and a New Trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(B) and 59(a) and DENIES Opponents' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and a New Trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(B) and 59(a).Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 9/2/20. (afar) |
Filing 828 SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER II. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 1/13/20. (afar) |
Filing 289 SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER I. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 5/15/2019. (dcou, ) |
Filing 274 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 4/29/2019. (dcou, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.