Equal Employment v. National Restaurant
3:2004cv00274 |
April 22, 2004 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Robert E. Payne |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT of hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 01/03/05 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar) |
Filing 10 JUDGMENT ORDER, Judgment by default is entered in favor of the pltf, EEOC against the dft, National Restaurant Enterprises, the dft shall pay monetary relief to the named Charging Parties indentified in the Complain being Adiza Kay Lhuillier, Christopher Lhuillier and John Lhuillier (See Order for details) ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 01/05/05 ) Copies Mailed: yes and to RA for National Restaurant Enterprises and to the Clerk US Bankruptcy Court (Delaware) [EOD Date: 1/6/05] (cgar) Modified on 01/06/2005 |
Case closed (cgar) |
Filing 9 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Plaintiff by counsel. No appearance on behalf of the defendant. Counsel for the Plaintiff made statements to the Court. The Court will enter an order awarding damages to the Plaintiff and granting the Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. (snea) |
Filing 8 Response (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Memorandum Regarding Damages) by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to [7-1] Order (lsal) |
Motion hearing for Equal Employment, National Restaurant [4-1] motion for Default Judgment against National Restaurant set at 2:00 1/3/05 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea) |
Filing 7 ORDER that the Pltf shall by December 23, 2004, file a detailed statement of damages with evidentiary support and a supporting brief and that a hearing on damages shall be held 2:00p.m. January 3, 2005 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 12/13/04] (kste) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to National Restaurant granting [5-1] motion by Equal Employment for Entry of Default as to National Restaurant (cgar) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Equal Employment for Entry of Default as to National Restaurant (w/declaration of Stacey Turner Caldwell) (cgar) |
Filing 4 MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Equal Employment for Default Judgment against National Restaurant (cgar) |
Filing 3 ORDER that, by November 22, 2004, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall take steps to move this case forward or it shall be dismissed for lack of prosecution; the Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by facsimile and regular mail and to the National Restaurant Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Ameriking Corporation, c/o CT Corporation System, Registered Agent, 4701 Cox Road, Suite 301, Richmond, Virginia 23060-6802, by regular mail ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and by facsimile as direct [EOD Date: 11/18/04] (cmcc) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to National Restaurant 8/12/04 Answer due on 9/1/04 for National Restaurant (cgar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT; filing fee waived; jury demand (cmcc) |
SUMMONS(ES) issued for National Restaurant; mailed to counsel (cmcc) |
Jury Trial Flag (cmcc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Equal Employment v. National Restaurant | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.