Kolon Industries v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours
Counter_claimant: Kolon Industries, Inc.
Counter_defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Case Number: 3:2011cv00622
Filed: September 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Payne
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 25
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 672 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Redacted). Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 4/20/2012. Copies to counsel.(cmcc, )
April 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 637 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 5/4/2012. (cgar)
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 430 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/28/2012. Copies to counsel.(cmcc, )
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 408 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/23/12. (jtho, )
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 402 MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/22/2012. (walk, )
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 399 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 2/21/2012. Copies to counsel.(cmcc, )
September 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 9/20/2011. Copies to counsel. FILED NUNC PRO TUNC 9/20/2011.(cmcc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kolon Industries v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Kolon Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Victoria Anne Cundiff
Represented By: Brian Ankenbrandt
Represented By: Dana Johannes Finberg
Represented By: Scott Mitchell Flicker
Represented By: Daniel Bruce Goldman
Represented By: Michael Christopher Hendershot
Represented By: Stephen B. Kinnaird
Represented By: Robert McHenry
Represented By: William Novomisle
Represented By: Thomas Peter O'Brien
Represented By: Daniel Prince
Represented By: Jeffrey Graham Randall
Represented By: Rhodes Beahm Ritenour
Represented By: Igor Victor Timofeyev
Represented By: Christina Davidson Trimmer
Represented By: Carla Walworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Represented By: Thomas Moultrie Beshere, III
Represented By: Stephen Matthew Byers
Represented By: Kristen Marie Calleja
Represented By: Kathleen Mary Clair
Represented By: David Daniel Cross
Represented By: Matthew Devane Fender
Represented By: Kent Alan Gardiner
Represented By: Robyn Suzanne Gray
Represented By: Astor Henry Lloyd Heaven, III
Represented By: Andrew David Kaplan
Represented By: Shari Ross Lahlou
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Poston
Represented By: Brian Charles Riopelle
Represented By: Terence P. Ross
Represented By: Rodney A. Satterwhite
Represented By: Michael Joseph Songer
Represented By: Luke Peter van Houwelingen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?