Chrisp v. Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc. et al

Defendant: Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc. and Joshue Medina
Plaintiff: Antonio Chrisp
Case Number: 3:2013cv00175
Filed: March 20, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Accomack
Presiding Judge: John A. Gibney
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chrisp v. Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew David Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshue Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Chrisp
Represented By: Douglas Keith Wagner Landau
Represented By: Lawrence Steven Emmert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.