Collier v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Terri Collier
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2013cv00242
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Accomack
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Payne
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 31, 2014 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled; adopting 17 Report and Recommendation; denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 10 Motion to Remand; the Commissioner's decision is vacated and the action is remanded to the Social Security Adminstration (signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/31/2014) (rpiz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collier v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri Collier
Represented By: Bruce Knight Billman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.