Pickering v. Virginia State Police
Nathan Pickering |
Virginia State Police |
3:2014cv00163 |
March 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Colonial Heights City |
James R. Spencer |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 10/03/2014. (walk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pickering v. Virginia State Police | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Virginia State Police | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nathan Pickering | |
Represented By: | Blackwell Nixon Shelley, Jr. |
Represented By: | Tim Schulte |
Represented By: | Timothy E. Cupp |
Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Fisher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.