Siebert v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff: Richard D. Sibert
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Case Number: 3:2014cv00737
Filed: October 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Richmond City
Presiding Judge: Henry E. Hudson
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 50 U.S.C. ยง 0501
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 05/04/2016. (tjoh, )
June 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 06/26/2015. (tjoh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siebert v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard D. Sibert
Represented By: Richard Thomas Harry, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Represented By: Terry Catherine Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?