Anderson v. Stolley
Petitioner: Ronnie Lesha Anderson
Respondent: Ken Stolley
Case Number: 3:2014cv00847
Filed: December 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge: Henry E. Hudson
Presiding Judge: Roderick C. Young
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. The § 2254 Petition is DENIED;Anderson's claims and the action are DISMISSED; and,The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/04/2015. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (tjoh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Stolley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronnie Lesha Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ken Stolley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?