Microstrategy Incorporated v. Apttus Corporation
Plaintiff: Microstrategy Incorporated
Defendant: Apttus Corporation
Case Number: 3:2015cv00021
Filed: January 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Fairfax
Presiding Judge: John A. Gibney
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 07/17/2015. (ccol, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Microstrategy Incorporated v. Apttus Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Microstrategy Incorporated
Represented By: Daniel Robert Gopenko
Represented By: Andrew Robert Kopsidas
Represented By: John Wesley Samples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apttus Corporation
Represented By: Veronica Susana Ascarrunz
Represented By: Ryan Ronald Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?