Wilson v. Woods
Plaintiff: Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant: David Woods
Case Number: 3:2016cv00578
Filed: July 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Williamsburg City
Presiding Judge: Henry E. Hudson
Presiding Judge: Roderick C. Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 09/30/2019. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (tjoh, )
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 5/30/2019. Copy to Wilson as directed. (jsmi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Claude Owen Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?