Anderson v. Bivens et al
Plaintiff: Wayne Anderson and Wayne D. Anderson
Defendant: Sherida Davis-Bryan and Robert Bivens
Case Number: 3:2018cv00748
Filed: October 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Referring Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form and did not pay the statutory filing fee. Plaintiff advised of right to appeal within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/17/2018. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
December 18, 2018 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/17/2018. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
November 21, 2018 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Wayne D. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (smej, )
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 11/7/2018. Memorandum Order was mailed to Plaintiff. (sbea, )
October 31, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wayne Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Trust Statement, #2 Envelope)(ccol, )
October 31, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert Bivens, and Sherida Davis-Bryan, filed by Wayne Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit E-1, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Envelope)(ccol, )
October 31, 2018 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge was checked "YES" in box on 1983 form by Wayne Anderson. (ccol, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Bivens et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sherida Davis-Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Bivens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne D. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?