Agbati v. Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Ehonam M. Agbati and Roger Agbati |
Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services |
3:2019cv00512 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John A Gibney |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Cross-Motion re: #10 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File, and Memorandum in Response re: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings, by Ehonam M. Agbati. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. For good cause shown, it is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED that the Defendants shall have up to and including October 1, 2019, to file an answer, motions and/or other pleadings responsive to the Plaintiff's Complaint #3 , Motion for Release of Documents #5 , and Motion for Order to be Allowed to Present/Play Audio Recording Evidence #6 . Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 8/19/19. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (jsau, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hardy, Ryan) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services served on 8/12/2019, answer due 9/3/2019 (jsau, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Spreague Hardy on behalf of Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Hardy, Ryan) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Order to be Allowed to Present/Play Audio Recording Evidences in Court Using Laptop Computer and Portable Speaker, by Ehonam M. Agbati. (Attachments: #1 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Release of Documents by Ehonam M. Agbati. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Placed in USM box for service. (Attachments: #1 USM Form)(jsau, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, filed by Ehonam M. Agbati. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Dismissal, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 "Proofs" Documents Filed with EEOC Part 1 (1-22), #8 "Proofs" Documents Filed with EEOC Part 1 (23-45), #9 "Proofs" Documents of Grievance, #10 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs motion to proceed informa pauperis #1 . Upon due consideration, the Court FINDS the plaintiff unable to pay the costs of proceeding in this case. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the plaintiffs motion. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to docket the complaint and to issue summons upon the defendant. The Court DIRECTS the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant with the summons and a copy of the complaint. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 7/26/19. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (jsau, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ehonam M. Agbati. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 EEOC Dismissal, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 "Proofs" Documents Filed with EEOC Part 1 (1-22), #9 "Proofs" Documents Filed with EEOC Part 2 (23-45), #10 "Proofs" Documents of Grievance, #11 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.