Tekle v. Dewalt et al.
| Daniel Tekle |
| Ms. Dewalt and Ms. Andrea Laymon |
| 3:2019cv00559 |
| August 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Roderick C Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action). It is ORDERED that: this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; the Court has received a money order for $350.00 from Plaintiff. Plaintiff owes another $50.00 in an administrative fee. Plaintiff is directed to submit the additional $50.00 within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof. Plaintiff is prohibited from filing any other pleadings, motions, memoranda, or material not specifically required herein or otherwise specifically ordered by the Court until he is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pays the full filing fee. Any documents submitted in violation of this paragraph will not be considered. It is so ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 8/29/19. (Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff (jsau, ) (jsau, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrea Laymon, Ms. Dewalt, filed by Daniel Tekle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-41)(jsau, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
