Johnson v. Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation et al
| Fred L. Johnson |
| Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation, Jason Wilson and Anita Schlank |
| 3:2019cv00722 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Roderick C Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation as to Fred L. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Transaction Report). (sbea, ) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM ORDER Conditionally Filing 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition. It is ORDERED that: The Petition is CONDITIONALLY FILED pending payment of any assessed filing fee; The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to process Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis. If an appropriate affidavit for proceeding in forma pauperis has not been submitted, the Clerk shall mail an appropriate in forma pauperis affidavit to Petitioner. Failure of Petitioner to complete and return the informa pauperis affidavit or pay the $5.00 filing fee within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof will result in dismissal of the action. The Clerk shall obtain a certified copy of Petitioner's trust fund account for the six (6) month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a Notice & Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate form. Petitioner should only return this form if Petitioner consents to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. If Petitioner consents to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner should return this form within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 11/12/2019. Memorandum order and Notice & Consent were mailed to the Petitioner. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent) (sbea, )
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Fred L. Johnson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). Filing fee was not received. (sbea, ) |
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER Directing Petitioner to Complete and Return Form. If Petitioner wishes to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the proper form. The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the form and SEND the form to Petitioner. If Petitioner wishes to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must complete and return the form to the Court within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof. In the alternative, Petitioner may file, within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof, a motion to withdraw this action. If Petitioner fails to take any action within that time, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 10/21/2019. Memorandum Order and 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus were mailed to the petitioner. (sbea, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT entitled "Motion to Dismiss Civil Commitment Under 8.01-428(o) Independent Action of My 11th, 5th 14th Amendment" against Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation, Jason Wilson, and Anita Schlank filed by Fred L. Johnson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
