Gillis v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, The Law Offices of Shapiro & Brown LLP, The Law Offices of Samuel I White PC, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Mers, Inc. and Professoinal Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia |
Brenda Coleman Gillis |
USBC-Richmond (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
3:2019cv00875 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. § 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Opposition to #9 MOTION to Strike #7 Order on Motion to Dismiss, OPPOSITION OF MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. TO MOTION TO STRIKE ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Mers, Inc.. (Tarkenton, Jeffrey) |
USCA Case Number 20-1047 USCA Case manager Emily Borneisen for #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (teva, ) |
Filing 12 Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #11 Notice of Appeal (All case opening forms, plus the transcript guidelines, may be obtained from the Fourth Circuit's website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov) (teva, ) |
Assembled INITIAL Electronic Record Transmitted to 4CCA re #11 Notice of Appeal (teva, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Order, by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Unmarked Exhibits, #2 Local Rule 83.1) (smej, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Hearing re #4 Motion for Summary Affirmance by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Unmarked Exhibits, #2 Local Rule 83.1) (smej, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #7 Order, by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1, #2 Unmarked Exhibits) (smej, ) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Motion for Summary Affirmance with Roseboro,. filed by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE - It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: The Motion for Summary Affirmance GRANTED; and This Order entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court on November 8, 2019 [Dkt. 59] is hereby AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/31/2019. (Copy mailed to Appellant) (smej, ) |
Filing 6 Appellant's BRIEF by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1) (smej, ) |
Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 Motion for Summary Affirmance with Roseboro,. filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Mers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Tarkenton, Jeffrey) Modified to correct docket text on 12/10/2019 (smej, ). |
Filing 4 Motion for Summary Affirmance with Roseboro,. by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Mers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Roseboro Notice)(Tarkenton, Jeffrey) Modified to correct docket text on 12/10/2019 (smej, ). |
Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Mers, Inc.. (Tarkenton, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 Letters from the Clerk sent to Appellant and appellees represented by counsel regarding Bankruptcy Appeal filed in USDC. Copy of Rule 8018 also sent to parties. (Attachments: #1 Rule 8018) (smej, ) |
Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court Lead Case No. 18-33270-KLP / Adv. Proceeding No. 18-03101-KLP, filed by Brenda Coleman Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.