Fulp v. Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy, PC, et al.
| Keko Fulp |
| John Does 1-25 and Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy, PC |
| 3:2020cv00053 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy, PC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the Defendant. Please ask your process server to return the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (walk, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Keko Fulp. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 1 Class Action Complaint filed by Keko Fulp against Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy, PC, et al. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-7049278). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Stein, Aryeh). Modified docket entry on 01/30/2020 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
