Morrisette v. Unknown
Paul Morrisette |
Unknown |
3:2020cv00384 |
June 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Roderick C Young |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION and Affidavit in Support to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Paul Morrisette. (walk, ) |
Filing 7 Consent to Collection of Fees by Paul Morrisette. (walk, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form and in forma pauperis affidavit and did not pay the statutory filing fee. Should Plaintiff desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be fi led with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 7/17/2020. Memorandum Opinion and Order were mailed to the Plaintiff. (sbea,) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 7/17/2020. (sbea,) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Hampton Roads Regional Jail as to Paul Morrisette. (walk, ) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER that: (1) This action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; (2) Within 30 days, Plaintiff must submit a statement under oath or under penalty of perjury that (please see Memorandum Order for additional information); (3) The Clerk shall obtain a certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for the six-month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; (4) Plaintiff must affirm his intention to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee. Accordingly, he is required to read, sign, and return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days; and, (5) Failure to comply strictly with any of the above time requirements will result in summary dismissal of the action (please see Memorandum Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 06/11/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff with Consent to Collections of Fees form and IFP Affidavit. Letter and Inmate Account Report Form mailed to Hampton Roads Regional Jail. (walk, ) |
Filing 2 Application by Paul Morrisette to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (walk, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT filed by Paul Morrisette against Unknown. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morrisette v. Unknown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Unknown | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Paul Morrisette | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.