Straight Line Drive, Inc. v. Vanatta, et al.
| Straight Line Drive, Inc. |
| Mr. Lee Vanatta and Mr. Jitan Kuverji |
| 3:2020cv00779 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Robert E Payne |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Court Reporter Harding, OCR): Motion Hearing held on 12/3/2020 re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by defendant Jitan Kuverji, and for an Initial Pretrial Conference. Argument heard. Findings given from the Bench; motion granted without prejudice. Initial Pretrial Conference postponed until case reaches appropriate posture for setting of a trial date. (rpiz) |
| Set Hearings as to #2 Motion to Dismiss: Motion Hearing set for 12/3/2020 at 11:00 AM in Richmond Courtroom 7000 before District Judge Henry E. Hudson; Initial Pretrial Conference rescheduled to 11:00 AM on 12/3/2020 (rpiz) |
| Filing 17 SUGGESTION OF DEATH Upon the Record as to Lee Vanatta by Straight Line Drive, Inc.. (Upton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 16 Defendant Jitan Kuverji's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jitan Kuverji.(Mullins, James) |
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER with Attachment #1 Pretrial Schedule A - Initial Pretrial Conference set for 12/3/2020 at 10:45 AM before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Order issued by deputy clerk at the direction of the Court) (rpiz)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) filed by Jitan Kuverji. (Mullins, James) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) filed by Straight Line Drive, Inc.. (Upton, Jennifer) |
| Notice of Correction re: #9 Request for Entry of Default as to Lee Vanatta; Clerk notified filing attorney of correct language that needs to be included for the completion of the Request for Entry of Default. Attorney is requested to amend the Affidavit and re-file it, linking it back to #9 Request for Entry of Default. (sbea,) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Samuel Alexander Mullman Pro Hac Vice for Straight Line Drive, Inc. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/22/2020. (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Kelly Wallace to appear as Pro Hac Vice for Straight Line Drive, Inc. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/22/2020. (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER (Substitution of Counsel). It appearing just and proper to do so, Frederick Daniel Taylor and the law firm of Bush & Taylor PC are RELIEVED as counsel for Plaintiff. Jennifer L. Upton and Andrew G. Mauck are SUBSTITUTED as counsel in this matter. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/22/2020. (sbea,)
|
| Filing 9 Request for Entry of Default as to Lee Vanatta by Straight Line Drive, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Affidavit of Samuel A. Mullman)(Upton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Samuel A. Mullman and Certification of Local Counsel Jennifer L. Upton Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7457203. by Straight Line Drive, Inc.. (Upton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Kelly Wallace and Certification of Local Counsel Jennifer L. Upton Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7457172. by Straight Line Drive, Inc.. (Upton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Straight Line Drive, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Upton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Substitution of Counsel of Frederick Daniel Taylor by Andrew Gray Mauck on behalf of Straight Line Drive, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorney)(Mauck, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Substitution of Counsel of Frederick Daniel Taylor by Jennifer Lynne Upton on behalf of Straight Line Drive, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Upton, Jennifer) |
| Notice of Correction re: #4 and #5 Notices of Substitution of Counsel, Clerk is requesting filing attorneys be sure to include on Certificate of Service that documents are mailed to pro se defendant, Lee Vanatta. (sbea,), |
| Case REASSIGNED to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. District Judge Robert E. Payne no longer assigned to the case. (sbea,) |
| Filing 3 Memorandum in Support re #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) filed by Jitan Kuverji. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Jitan Kuverji)(Mullins, James) |
| Notice of Correction re: #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal); Clerk notified filing attorney of proper filing procedures for filing a Motion. Filing attorney was requested to refile the Memorandum in Support as a separate document to include the Exhibit. (sbea, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) by Jitan Kuverji. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit)(Mullins, James) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing Fee $400, Receipt Number: 0422-7432240), filed by Jitan Kuverji. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Initial Complaint filed in Surry County)(Mullins, James). Modified docket text on 10/6/2020. (sbea,) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/27/2020 as 2 documents had to be redacted) (tjoh, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (sbea,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
