Redford v. Northam et al
Plaintiff: Mike Redford
Defendant: Mark Herring and Ralph Northam
Case Number: 3:2020cv00784
Filed: October 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: David J Novak
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Screening Action) that Plaintiff has complied with the prior Memorandum Order. Upon review of Plaintiff's inmate account, the partial filing fee is WAIVED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The action is FILED and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will now review the action in accordance with federal law. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (please see Memorandum Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 11/24/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. Copy mailed to Carhoun State Prison with a copy of #6 Consent to Collection of Fees form. (walk, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 6 Consent to Collection of Fees by Mike Redford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (walk, )
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION and Affidavit in Support to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mike Redford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (walk, )
November 10, 2020 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Carhoun State Prison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Letter)(tjoh, )
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action) that Plaintiff, a Georgia inmate, has submitted this civil action. He also has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED that: 1. This action is CONDITIONALLY docketed. 2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of entry hereof, Plaintiff must submit a statement under oath or under penalty of perjury that: (please see Memorandum Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 10/30/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff with IFP and Consent to Collection of Fees forms. Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement form and Letter mailed to Carhoun State Prison. (walk, )
October 1, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION and Affidavit in Support to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mike Redford. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (walk, ).
October 1, 2020 Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT filed by Mike Redford against Mark Herring and Ralph Northam. (Attachments: #1 Unmarked Attachments and #2 Envelope). (walk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redford v. Northam et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike Redford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Herring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph Northam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?