Spanos v. Vick
Plaintiff: Nickolas G. Spanos
Defendant: Howard C. Vick, Jr.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00638
Filed: October 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John A Gibney
Referring Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that the Court REMANDS this case to the Circuit Court of the County of Henrico pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Should the plaintiff wish to appeal this Order, he must file a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of Court in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia within 30 days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 12/20/2021. Copy of Order and Memorandum Opinion mailed to all counsel of record and the pro se plaintiff as directed.(adun, )
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 12/20/2021. (adun, )
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff, Nickolas G. Spanos's motion for recusal of the undersigned. (ECF No. #17 .) Because Spanos has failed to allege facts establishing that recusal is appropriate, the Court DENIES the motion. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Should Spanos wish to appeal this Order, he must file a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of Court in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 12/6/2021. A copy of this Memorandum Order was sent to pro se plaintiff as directed. (asho, )
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION for Recusal by Nickolas G. Spanos. (asho, )
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Howard C. Vick, Jr. (Santos, Brandon)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs letter. (ECF No. #14 .) In his letter, the plaintiff states his belief that there exists a "conflict-of-interest issue" regarding the current assignment of his case before the Court. The Court DIRECTS the plaintiff to file a brief more fully explaining his argument within fourteen days of the entry of this order. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 11/10/2021. Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff. (jpow, )
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Letter received from Nickolas Spanos. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(asho, )
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 11/3/2021. Copy sent to Plaintiff. (asho, )
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by Howard C. Vick, Jr. (Santos, Brandon)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Nickolas G. Spanos. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(asho, )
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel by Nickolas G. Spanos. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(asho, )
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nickolas G. Spanos. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(asho, )
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER (Reassigning Case) The undersigned RECUSES himself from presiding over this case because the undersigned Judge has a conflict. Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to REASSIGN this case to the Honorable John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/25/2021. Copy sent to Plaintiff as directed. (asho, )
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Reassigned to District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. District Judge Henry E. Hudson no longer assigned to the case. (asho, )
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RECUSAL ORDER - This matter comes before the Court following reassignment to the undersigned. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455, it is hereby ORDERED that the undersigned recuses himself from presiding over this action. It is further ORDERED that this case shall be reassigned pursuant to the standard random assignment procedure of the Clerk's Office. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/22/2021. Copy of order mailed to plaintiff as directed. (jpow, )
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Reassigned to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jpow, )
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER This matter comes before the Court on its own initiative. The undersigned RECUSES herself from presiding over this case because the undersigned has a conflict in this matter. The Court finds it in the interest of judicial efficiency to randomly reassign this case. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to RANDOMLY REASSIGN this case using the Clerk's standard assignment procedure. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 10/21/2021. (asho, )
October 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Randomly Reassigned to District Judge David J. Novak. District Judge M. Hannah Lauck no longer assigned to the case. (asho, )
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by Howard C. Vick, Jr. (Santos, Brandon)
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by Howard C. Vick, Jr. (Santos, Brandon)
October 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon Michael Santos on behalf of Howard C. Vick, Jr (Santos, Brandon)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen V. Hubbard on behalf of Howard C. Vick, Jr (Hubbard, Ellen)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8032801), filed by Howard C. Vick, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint and Exhibits to Same Filed in Henrico County Circuit Court, #2 Exhibit B - Demurrer to Complaint filed in Henrico County Circuit Court, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hooe, Garrett). (asho, ). Clerk replaced Exhibit A with redactions at filing attorney's request on 10/5/2021) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/6/2021. NEF was regenerated. Modified docket text on 10/6/2021. (sbea,)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (asho, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spanos v. Vick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nickolas G. Spanos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard C. Vick, Jr.
Represented By: Garrett Hooe
Represented By: Brandon Michael Santos
Represented By: Ellen V. Hubbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?