Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
| Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr. |
| Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March |
| 3:2022cv00168 |
| March 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| David J Novak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension Time by Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Assessing Initial Partial Filing Fee) Plaintiff has complied with the prior Memorandum Order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: Within eleven (11) days of the date of entry hereof, Plaintiff must submit an initial partial filing fee of $18.43 or state under penalty of perjury that he does not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee. Plaintiff remains liable for the entire filing fee of $350.00. If Plaintiff is unable or unwilling to comply with any of the above procedures, he may move to voluntarily dismiss the action. SEE MEMORANDUM ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 5/10/2022. A copy of this Memorandum Order sent to Plaintiff as directed. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 9
Response to #5 Order filed by Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 7
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement Received. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 6
Consent to Collection of Fees Received by Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action) It is ORDERED that: This action is CONDITIONALLY docketed. Within thirty (30) days from the date of entry hereof, Plaintiff must submit a statement under oath or under penalty of perjury that: Identifies the nature of the action; States his belief that he is entitled to relief; Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give security therefor; and, Includes a statement of the assets he possesses. The Clerk shall obtain a certified copy of Plaintiffs trust fund account for the six (6) month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action. Plaintiff must affirm his intention to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 4/12/2022. A copy of this Order sent to Plaintiff as directed. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 4
Case transferred in from District of Maryland; Case Number 1:22-cv-00621. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/29/2022: #2 Prisoner Data Report) (ldab, ).
|
|
Notification of transfer of 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights case from the District of Maryland Case No. 1:22cv621 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Transferring case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 2/28/2022. (c/m 3/28/2022 bas, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 3/29/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr(kos, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 3/29/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against L. E. G., Lancaster County Police Department, Ursula E. March, filed by Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kos, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 3/29/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
