Di Severia et al v. Front Row Motorsports, Inc.
| Michael DiSeveria, Ronald C Devine and Michael Di Severia |
| Front Row Motorsports, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00337 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Court Reporter Harding, OCR): Motion Hearing held on 6/7/2022 re #3 Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer or Stay filed by defendant Front Row Motorsports, Inc. Argument heard. Motion granted; case to be transferred to the Western District of North Carolina. Memorandum Opinion to enter. (rpiz)
|
|
Set Hearings in case as to #3 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer or Stay: Motion Hearing set for 6/7/2022 at 10:00 AM in Richmond Courtroom 7000 before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (rpiz)
|
|
Filing 9
REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or In the Alternative to Transfer or Stay filed by Front Row Motorsports, Inc.. (Trimmer, Daniel)
|
|
Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Pretrial Conference reset for 6/7/2022 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (rpiz)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or In the Alternative to Transfer or Stay filed by Ronald C Devine, Michael DiSeveria. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of T. Reid)(Reid, Trevor)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER (Granting Motion to Continue Pretrial Conference) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Front Row Motorsports, Inc.' s Consent Motion to Continue Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for June 2, 2022. (ECF No. #6 .) Counsel represents that he has a personal conflict that prevents his attendance. Therefore, it appearing good cause is shown, and there being no objection by Plaintiffs, the Motion is GRANTED. The Initial Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to June 7, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 5/19/2022. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Continue Pretrial Conference by Front Row Motorsports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Trimmer, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER with Attachment #1 Pretrial Schedule A - Initial Pretrial Conference set for 6/2/2022 at 9:45 AM before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Order issued by deputy clerk at the direction of the Court) (rpiz)
|
|
Filing 4
Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or In the Alternative to Transfer or Stay filed by Front Row Motorsports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Robert A. Jenkins, #2 Exhibit 2 - North Carolina Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Daniel S. Trimmer, #4 Exhibit 4 - Disposition Timing Data)(Trimmer, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or In the Alternative to Transfer or Stay by Front Row Motorsports, Inc.. (Trimmer, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement by Front Row Motorsports, Inc.. (Trimmer, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8367023.), filed by Front Row Motorsports, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings)(Trimmer, Daniel)
|
|
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (asho, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
