National Federation of the Blind of Virginia et al v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
National Federation of the Blind of Virginia, Nacarlo Antonio Courtney, William Landrum Hajacos, Michael McCann, Wilbert Green Rogers, Kevin Muhammad Shabazz, Patrick Shaw and William Stravitz |
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Kevin Punturi, Darrell Miller, Tammy Williams, Lane Talbott, Lakeisha Shaw, Larry Edmonds, Officer D. Smith, Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., VitalCore Health Strategies, Vincent Gore, M.D., Alvin Harris, M.D., Nurse Cynthia Lester, Pranay Gupta, M.D. and Virginia Information Technologies Agency |
3:2023cv00127 |
February 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.