Bates v. Clarke
Petitioner: Britney Odell Bates
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Case Number: 3:2023cv00359
Filed: May 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Mark R Colombell
Referring Judge: Henry E Hudson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2023 Opinion or Order STATE COURT RECORDS received from Virginia Court of Appeals in record#: 0573-20-4. One USB received and placed in brown exp. (adun, )
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Roseboro,. by Harold W. Clarke. (Brooker, Lindsay)
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Brief in Support to #5 Response to Habeas Petition, #6 MOTION to Dismiss with Roseboro,. filed by Harold W. Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Brooker, Lindsay)
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Roseboro Notice by Harold W. Clarke (Brooker, Lindsay)
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss with Roseboro,. by Harold W. Clarke. (Brooker, Lindsay)
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Rule 5 Answer RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Harold W. Clarke.(Brooker, Lindsay)
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order State Court Record received from Supreme Court of Virginia in record #220395. 1 Flash Drive (placed in brown expandable). (jenjones, )
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED from Stafford County Circuit Court in case number CR19000326-00. One small box of loose documents received. (placed in brown expandable) (adun, )
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Brooker on behalf of Harold W. Clarke (Brooker, Lindsay)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Receipt as to #2 Order of Prisoner Service (2254), filed by Harold W. Clarke. (Brooker, Lindsay)
June 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Serving 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition) - It is ORDERED that: The petition is FILED; Respondent shall file a responsive pleading within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this Memorandum Order; The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve Respondent. Service shall be made by electronically transmitting a copy of this Memorandum Order and the petition to the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 6/13/2023. (jenjones, )
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 300001435.) filed by Britney Odell Bates. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope) Clerk mailed extra copy back to petitioner as requested. (jenjones, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bates v. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Britney Odell Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Represented By: Lindsay Brooker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?