Gazich v. State of South Carolina, Greenville County
| Michael Gazich |
| State of South Carolina, Greenville County |
| 3:2023cv00614 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE- IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Petitioner Michael Gazich failed to keep the Court informed of his current address. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant, State of South Carolina, Greenville County. Signed by Clerk on 11/16/2023. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff)(adun, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Petitioner Michael Gazich failed to keep the Court informed of his current address. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a final appealable Judgment in a Civil Case in favor of Respondent. The Court does not grant leave to amend, rendering this order final and appealable. Should Petitioner desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/16/2023. Copy of Opinion and Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/16/2023. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 3
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Michael Gazich. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Directing Petitioner to Complete and Return Form) - If Petitioner wishes to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the proper form. The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the form and SEND the form to Petitioner. If Petitioner wishes to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must complete and return the form to the Court within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof. In the alternative, Petitioner may file, within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof, a motion to withdraw this action. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 10/6/2023. (Copy mailed to petitioner with a 2254 form) (smej, )
|
|
Filing 1
Motion Farretta Hearing, filed by Michael Gazich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Envelope)(adun, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gazich v. State of South Carolina, Greenville County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Gazich | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of South Carolina, Greenville County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
