Mayns v. Shu Staff
| Guy Mayns |
| Shu Staff |
| 3:2023cv00881 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| Roderick C Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE- IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form and in forma pauperis affidavit and did not pay the statutory filing fee. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants, Shu Staff. Signed by Clerk on 2/23/2024. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER- The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form and in forma pauperis affidavit and did not pay the statutory filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a final appealable Judgment in a Civil Case in favor of Defendant as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff does not request, and the Court does not grant, leave to amend, rendering this Order final and appealable. Should Plaintiff desire toappeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within 60 days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 2/23/2024. Copy of Opinion and Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 2/23/2024. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement as to Guy Mayns. (Attachments: #1 Account History)(jenjones, )
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action) It is ORDERED that: This action is CONDITIONALLY docketed. Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within thirty (30) days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for 6-month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff must affirm his intention to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. It is so ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 1/4/2024. Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff with Bivens Form, IFP Form and Consent to Collection of Fees. Inmate Account Form and copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff's Institution.(jenjones, )
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Shu Staff filed by Guy Mayns. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jsmi, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mayns v. Shu Staff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Guy Mayns | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shu Staff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
