Diedrich v. City of Newport News, Virginia et al
Jason Leon Diedrich |
City of Newport News, Virginia, James M. Bourey, Richard W. Myers and Yvonne M. Manning |
4:2015cv00002 |
January 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Newport News Office |
Newport News City |
Raymond A. Jackson |
Lawrence R. Leonard |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 AMENDED ORDER re 24 MOTION to Stay re 22 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Jason Leon Diedrich. The Court finds it absolutely inappropriate to grant a stay, and Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 5/19/16 and filed on 5/20/16. (tbro) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendant is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $10,260. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 3/31/16. (tbro) |
Filing 12 ORDER re 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants' 12 (b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Counts One and Two is GRANTED. The Court DECLINES to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims (Count Three) and they are hereby DISMISSED. Because Plaintiffs Fifth Amendment and due process claims have been disposed of, the Court does not need to reach the qualified immunity issue raised by Defendants. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 8/11/15. (tbro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.