Kimbler v. Spear et al
| 1:2016cv00047 |
| December 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Abingdon Office |
| James P. Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
OPINION and ORDER denying without prejudice 7 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 7/11/17. (flc)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER deferring ruling on 7 Motion for Summary Judgment; plt's request for discovery under Rule 56(d)(2) is GRANTED only to the limited extent described in this opinion and order; discovery permitted must be completed within 30 da ys; plt. may file supplemental response to the motion for summary judgment within 14 days after completion of the permitted discovery; dft's may file a reply within 7 days thereafter; dft's are directed to file an answer to the complaint prior to the deposition of defendant Spears, and in no event later than 14 days from this date. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 4/11/17. (flc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kimbler v. Spear et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
