Jackson v. Michalski et al
| Jason Jackson |
| Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Inc., Chris Michalski, Richard Spencer, Takimag.com, LLC, Taki Theodoracopoulos and John Zmirak |
| 3:2010cv00052 |
| October 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Charlottesville Office |
| Norman K. Moon |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER denying/overruling 82 Motion to appeal/objections to Magistrate Judge's ruling on motion to quash; denying 92 Motion for Reconsideration re 76 Order - Written Order Following Oral Order on Motion, 29 MOTION to Quash filed by Taki Theodoracopoulos. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 8/23/2011. (mab)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER granting 44 Motion to Dismiss; finding/denied as moot 48 Motion to Dismiss; granting 51 Motion to Dismiss; finding/denied as moot 53 Motion to Dismiss; finding/denied as moot 55 Motion to Dismiss; denying 105 Motion for Discovery; f inding/denied as moot 14 Motion for Hearing; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; finding/denied as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding/denied as moot 19 Motion to Dismiss; finding/denied as moot 21 Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 8/22/2011. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
