Winston v. True

Petitioner: Leon J. Winston
Respondent: William Page True
Case Number: 7:2007cv00364
Filed: July 27, 2007
Court: Virginia Western District Court
Office: Roanoke Office
County: Lynchburg City
Referring Judge: Michael F. Urbanski
Presiding Judge: Samuel G. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 6, 2009 129 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 03/06/2009. (rkc)
May 16, 2011 167 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 5/16/2011. (ssm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winston v. True
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leon J. Winston
Represented By: Jennifer L. Givens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Page True
Represented By: Steven Andrew Witmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.