Plaintiff charges that "Jon Swartz USA Today cardcops.com" is a reporter that writes about cybercrime. Plaintiff alleges that defendant entraps people by revealing how to commit identity theft in his articles, which then encourages people to commit cybercrime. Defendant allegedly then reports such crimes to the FBI for whistleblowing money.
Jonathan Lee Riches |
Jon Swartz, Ed Mierzwinski, creditcards.com, Phishing and World Wide Web |
7:2007cv00379 |
August 7, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Roanoke Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Michael F. Urbanski |
Samuel G. Wilson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
8
USCA Notice of intent to dismiss (kab)
|
Filing
7
USCA Notice of appellant needing to pay filing and dockting fee to the Clerk. (kab)
|
Filing
5
Transmittal of Notice of Appeal to 4CCA re 4 Notice of Appeal NOTE: The Docketing Statement and Transcript Order forms are available on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov. If applicable, the original CJA24(s) will be mailed directly to you by the District Court. (tvt)
|
Filing
3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, denying all pending motions as moot, and striking this case from the active docket of the court. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 8/13/2007. (kab )
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against all defendants (Filing fee $ 350.) , filed by Jonathan Lee Riches.(tvt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.