Smith v. Ely et al
| 7:2014cv00168 |
| April 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Robert S. Ballou |
| James C. Turk |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 131 , with additional findings and conclusions as noted ; Objections 132 are OVERRULED; dismissing as moot 125 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; Judgment is entered for Defendants Ely, Fannon, Carico, Combs, Fields, Tate and Mathena and this action is stricken from the active docket of the court. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 1/26/2016. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 120 ; denying 93 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/8/2015. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER OVERRULING Objections 65 filed by Corey Smith and AFFIRMING the May 6, 2015 order 62 on the grounds stated by the magistrate judge. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 5/22/2015. (slt)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 02/05/2015. (kab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Ely et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
