Anderson v. Brown, et al
| 7:2014cv00184 |
| April 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Robert S. Ballou |
| Michael F. Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER vacating March 4, 2015 Dismissal Order 37 adopting Report and Recommendations; DENYING 41 Motion for Reconsideration; OVERRULING Plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety; Defendant's 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is DENIED as moot; and the matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/13/2015. (slt)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 36 ; granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 25 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; denying 28 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; denying 29 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion; denying 30 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 3/3/2015. (tvt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anderson v. Brown, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
