Shabazz v. Lokey et al
| 7:2014cv00457 |
| August 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Robert S. Ballou |
| Jackson L. Kiser |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 102 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 9/24/2018. (tvt)
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 9/30/2017. (mf)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's claim pursuant to the Virginia Tort Claim Act without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(4) without prejudice; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING ON PART 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants' moti on for summary judgment is DENIED in part as to the federal religious claims against the defendants Lokey and Leatherwood and state law claim for detinue; and it is GRANTED in part as to the other claims and defendants. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 5/22/2015. (slt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shabazz v. Lokey et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
