DePaola v. Clarke et al
| 7:2015cv00403 |
| July 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| Robert S. Ballou |
| James P. Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
OPINION and ORDER granting in part as to defendants Barksdale, Schilling, Mathena, Ray, Kiser, Malone, Mullins, and Ketron and denying as to defendants Fletcher, Huff, and Trent regarding 155 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 8/5/2019. (slt)
|
|
Filing
202
OPINION and ORDER overruling plaintiffs objections, ECF No. 188 ; the magistratejudges Report, ECF No. 183 , is hereby ACCEPTED, and the motions forsummary judgment filed by Dr. McDuffie, ECF No. 88 , and Dr. Ahsan, ECF No. 113 , are GRANTED. The Clerk shall terminate these defendants on the docket. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 6/14/2019. (slt)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 9/27/2016. (slt)
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 9/3/2015. (slt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DePaola v. Clarke et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
