Peterson v. Barksdale et al
Case Number: 7:2016cv00217
Filed: May 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Roanoke Office
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Ballou
Presiding Judge: Glen E. Conrad
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 7/11/17. (ejs)
March 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION and ORDER denying 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; the plaintiff's response 16 is construed as a motion to amend his Complaint and it is GRANTED; the defendants shall file their answer to the complaint, as amended, within 14 days, the defendants shall file motions for summary judgment by no later than April 14, 2017; and the Clerk's Office shall set his case for a bench trial in the Big Stone Gap Division at least 120 days from the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 3/20/2017. (tvt)
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 11/28/2016. (slt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Barksdale et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?